Priority 18 from the Pessary use for Prolapse PSP
UNCERTAINTY: What should be considered when choosing which type of pessary for use in the treatment of prolapse? (JLA PSP Priority 18) | |
---|---|
Overall ranking | 18 |
JLA question ID | 0054/18 |
Explanatory note | Examples: How do doctors/nurses choose which pessary to fit? Size/cost/type etc? How will you know if a pessary is the best option for me? How do you decide which pessary to try? |
Evidence |
None identified |
Health Research Classification System category | Renal and urogenital |
Extra information provided by this PSP | |
---|---|
Original uncertainty examples |
Are some pessaries better than others (eg ring v cube)? ~ When would a cube pessary be of benefit? ~ I wasn't aware of all the different pessary devices available. How does the doctor select which to use? ~ What are the indications for the various pessary shapes and designs? ~ Is there a choice about which sort to use? ~ How will you know if a pessary is the best option for me? ~ Which type allow the patient to remove for intercourse? |
Submitted by | 1 x other, 5 x both, 4 x women, 12 x healthcare professional |
PSP information | |
---|---|
PSP unique ID | 0054 |
PSP name | Pessary use for Prolapse |
Total number of uncertainties identified by this PSP. | 66 (To see a full list of all uncertainties identified, please see the detailed spreadsheet held on the JLA website) |
Date of priority setting workshop | 8 September 2017 |