Priority 16 from the Pessary use for Prolapse PSP
UNCERTAINTY: What differences does a pessary make when used to treat a prolapse? (JLA PSP Priority 16) | |
---|---|
Overall ranking | 16 |
JLA question ID | 0054/16 |
Explanatory note | Future research needs to provide information about how a pessary works as a treatment for symptomatic prolapse. Examples: When a pessary is inserted, does pelvic floor function improve? Can a pessary help with pain asscoiated with POP? |
Evidence |
None identified |
Health Research Classification System category | Renal and urogenital |
Extra information provided by this PSP | |
---|---|
Original uncertainty examples |
Are pessaries helpful for those women suffering with grade 1 prolapse to to simply help them feel supported / less heavy? ~ Do pessaries completely put the prolapse back into place ? ~ Are removable pessary devises like the cube any worse for symptom relief than ring pessaries designed for longer use in situ? ~ When a pessary is inserted, does pelvic floor function improve? ~ Pessaries are the best choice for immediate relief of urinary stress incontinence and for reducing a prolapse. ~ Can a pessary help with pain asscoiated with POP? ~ Do pessaries halt prolapse worsening /deterioration? ~ Can the use of pessaries exacerbate some prolapse, i.e. a ring pessary can make a rectocele worse, or even led to a rectocele? ~ Do pessaries help to prevent prolapse worsening in young active women? |
Submitted by | 14 x women, 5 x both, 2 x other, 7 x healthcare professionals, 4 x literature |
PSP information | |
---|---|
PSP unique ID | 0054 |
PSP name | Pessary use for Prolapse |
Total number of uncertainties identified by this PSP. | 66 (To see a full list of all uncertainties identified, please see the detailed spreadsheet held on the JLA website) |
Date of priority setting workshop | 8 September 2017 |