Priority 15 from the Kidney Transplant PSP
UNCERTAINTY: Does routine screening for and treatment of donor-specific antibodies improve outcomes? What is the most effective treatment? | |
---|---|
Overall ranking | Priority questions agreed on but not put in ranked order |
JLA question ID | 0037/15 |
Explanatory note | Not available for this PSP |
Evidence |
Existing Systematic Review: Mohan, S., Palanisamy, A., Tsapepas, D., Tanriover, B., Crew, R. J., Dube, G., Ratner, L. E., Cohen, D. J., Radhakrishnan, J. Donor-specific antibodies adversely affect kidney allograft outcomes. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2012;23(12):2061-71 |
Health Research Classification System category | Renal and Urogenital |
Extra information provided by this PSP | |
---|---|
Original uncertainty examples |
Does screening for de novo specific HLA antibody with intervention in positives (Rituximab plus increase in maintenance immunosuppression) cause more good than harm? Does DSA surveillance improve outcomes post-transplant? How can we treat patients who have antibodies against the kidney in their blood ? How can we best prevent antibodies damaging kidney transplants? Would affinity and binding kinetics measurement serve as risk stratification for cases with donor specific antibodies? |
Comparison | Diagnostics |
Submitted by |
Clinicians x 5 |
Outcomes to be measured | Patient and graft survival, graft function, adverse events |
PSP information | |
---|---|
PSP unique ID | 0037 |
PSP name | Kidney Transplant |
Total number of uncertainties identified by this PSP. | 90 (To see a full list of all uncertainties identified, please see the detailed spreadsheet held on the JLA website) |
Date of priority setting workshop | 3 February 2016 |