Priority 18 from the Blood Transfusion and Blood Donation PSP
UNCERTAINTY: What is the best administrative process for hospital blood transfusion to keep patients safe and minimise delay? (JLA PSP Priority 18) | |
---|---|
Overall ranking | 18 |
JLA question ID | 0063/18 |
Explanatory note | Not available for this PSP |
Evidence |
1. NICE Guideline Recommendation: Electronic patient identification 2. Sellen KM, Jovanovic A, Perrier L, Chignell M. Systematic review of electronic remote blood issue. Vox Sanguinis. 2015;109(-1):35-43. |
Health Research Classification System category | Generic Health Relevance |
Extra information provided by this PSP | |
---|---|
Original uncertainty examples | How can modern technology e.g. apps for patients/healthcare professionals improve the transfusion process? ~ Why do you have to replicate all the info about blood transfusions on two separate forms that repeat the same information? ~ Can we rationalise the requesting process to reduce delays in urgent situations? ~ Is it possible to design a "reminder" for staff regarding component times for transfusion that is easy to access and carry? |
Submitted by | 8 blood recipients ~ 10 relatives or carers of blood recipients ~ 15 blood donors ~ 20 health professionals ~ 2 unknown |
PSP information | |
---|---|
PSP unique ID | 0063 |
PSP name | Blood Transfusion and Blood Donation |
Total number of uncertainties identified by this PSP | 51 (To see a full list of all uncertainties identified, please see the detailed spreadsheet held on the JLA website) |
Date of priority setting workshop | 28 February 2018 |